@article{oai:kgwu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000435,
 author = {熊谷, 園子 and Kumagai, Sonoko},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {川村学園女子大学研究紀要, The journal of Kawamura Gakuen Woman's University},
 month = {},
 note = {The Summary of 'Divergent Radicalisms : Hazlitt and Shelley.' This paper deals with the unique relationship between Hazlitt and Shelley. Though the former is a critic, and the latter a poet, they were both brought up in a climate of enthusiasm for God-winian doctorine in their youth, breathing the same intellectual air of the modern social sciences, and so they were on the same political side, that of republican and gradual reformer. As a young poet, Shelley owed much to Hazlitt, a successful critic, and admired him, despite Hazlitt's strong criticisms of his work. In spite of this situation, Hazlitt joined Shelley's last project; a radical political journal, The Liberal. This paper describes Hazlitt's criticism of Shelley, and the differences in their radicalisms., The Summary of 'Divergent Radicalisms : Hazlitt and Shelley.' This paper deals with the unique relationship between Hazlitt and Shelley. Though the former is a critic, and the latter a poet, they were both brought up in a climate of enthusiasm for God-winian doctorine in their youth, breathing the same intellectual air of the modern social sciences, and so they were on the same political side, that of republican and gradual reformer. As a young poet, Shelley owed much to Hazlitt, a successful critic, and admired him, despite Hazlitt's strong criticisms of his work. In spite of this situation, Hazlitt joined Shelley's last project; a radical political journal, The Liberal. This paper describes Hazlitt's criticism of Shelley, and the differences in their radicalisms.},
 pages = {9--19},
 title = {Divergent Radicalisms: Hazlitt and Shelley},
 volume = {7},
 year = {1996},
 yomi = {クマガイ, ソノコ}
}